- There are two bills in the state legislature that would legalize sports betting in Ohio.
- Senate Bill 111 and House Bill 194 both differ in their overall formats but each would make gambling on sporting events a legal pastime in the Buckeye State.
- OH HB 194 Sponsor Representative Dave Greenspan and OH SB 111 Sponsor Senator John Eklund spoke with LegalSportsBetting about their thoughts on Ohio legalizing sports betting.
COLUMBUS, Ohio – There are still two live bills that would legalize sports betting in Ohio currently being considered by the Ohio Legislature. Senate Bill 111 and House Bill 194 would both allow for the legal gambling on sporting events in the state.
These bills were first introduced in 2019 and remain the two viable options for making sports betting in the Buckeye State a legal activity. The sponsors behind each bill spoke with LegalSportsBetting about the outlook for their pieces of legislation and about the possible future of an Ohio sports gambling market.
Ohio House Bill 194 And Representative Dave Greenspan
OH HB 194 would legalize both retail and mobile sports betting in the state of Ohio. The regulator of the market under this bill would be the Ohio Lottery. They would oversee all of the rules and regulations for the entire sports gambling industry in the state.
There is a 10% tax rate set on all revenue made from the market. Kiosks that would accept sports bets would be allowed at various retail locations under OH HB 194.
This bill has had a number of hearings for amendments in its path toward legalization. Currently, the Coronavirus pandemic has put the state legislature on hold and when the session reconvenes, it is unknown whether or not sports betting will be a pressing issue for discussion.
Per Representative Greenspan, last amendments made on House Bill 194 took place on November 7, 2019 in its 8th hearing. The Finance Committee has not met for the 2020 session and that is where the bill needs to go next. However, Greenspan is confident in the future of sports betting legalization in Ohio.
“I’m confident we’re going to get it done, that to me has never been an issue, obviously the clock is an issue and COVID-19 is an issue right now but there is overwhelming support for the bill it’s just a matter of us having the ability to put it up for a vote and then getting it over to the Senate,” said Greenspan. “Hopefully the discussion there goes over rather quickly. The Senate has a bill as well but the differences between the two bills are not significant, they are significant in theory but not the overall goal for the bills.”
Greenspan believes that OH HB 194 has the best chances of making it to the finish line and becoming a law for the state of Ohio when compared to OH SB 111.
“We’ve had eight hearings and a number of amendments to the bill and the Senate has had two hearings and no amendments made to their bill so I believe our bill is further along in acceptance and its overall support,” said Greenspan.
“The main difference between the two bills is who actually has the authority to regulate and provide the oversight to the activity and I believe that the Lottery Commission is better suited and the Senate’s version of their bill would authorize the Casino Control Commission and that to me will be the largest single hurdle for us to get over but I believe we will because at the end of the day It’s irrelevant to the consumer,” said Greenspan.
“The issue is who has the infrastructure and who has the authority in order to support standing up sports gaming and the Lottery Commission already has the Constitutional authority to do it and they have the infrastructure to support the online component of sports gaming. The Casino Control Commission does not currently have the expertise or the staff or the authority to offer or regulate or manage sports gaming but the Lottery Commission already has the infrastructure in place and the authority by the Constitution.”
Making sports betting legal in Ohio is not something that is meant to bring in huge financial profits. It’s something to help bridge the gap but more so to make an activity that’s being done already be one that is regulated.
“This is an activity that we all openly acknowledge is happening illegally and so what we anticipate that by legalizing this, we will be able to absorb a lot of the illegal market over time,” said Greenspan. “The education system is the 98% benefactor of the revenue from the sports betting market with 2% going to sports gaming addiction related services.”
If House Bill 194 does not move forward as expected by the end of the year, it will need to be reintroduced next year for legalization.
Ohio Senate Bill 111 And Senator John Eklund
OH SB 111 would legalize sports betting at casino locations and through mobile platforms. Unlike the House bill, it wouldn’t allow for multiple retail locations for sportsbooks, limiting them to casino type establishments.
Under this bill, the Ohio Casino Control Commission (OCCC) would be the regulator of the sports betting market in the state. The tax rate is set at 6.25% for all revenue made from wagers on sporting events.
Speaking to Senator John Eklund about OH SB 111, there is currently nothing on the calendar for his bill.
“We are still in shutdown mode here in Ohio but there’s hope in the next few weeks we will start crawling out of that mode,” said Eklund. “The House bill takes a different approach than OH SB 111 does and it has been and remains somewhat unclear about the extent to which the House does or does not want to move their bill and if so whether there is going to be some way to reconcile it with the Senate Bill. I am hopeful and I have had conversations with others in the Ohio Senate and all of them feel that just because we’ve had this disruption that there is no reason to turn our backs on pending legislation that we thought was a good idea a month and a half ago because it is probably still a good idea. I am very very hopeful that we will be able to continue to move the sports gaming legislation over the course of the rest of this calendar year.”
When it comes to revenue, the Senate Bill has not discussed where sports betting profits would go. OH HB 194 stipulates where the money would go but the Senate Bill has not said a word and that was done on purpose according to Eklund.
“We can anticipate that Sports gaming in Ohio would generate some level of revenue for the state but I never thought it was going to be a gazillion dollars but at times like this, every little bit helps. The Senate bill is silent on where specifically the money would go and it’s purposefully silent because I wanted the legislative process to basically inform that decision so as we continue to have hearings on the Senate Bill I expect to hear from witnesses who have thoughtful and useful ideas of where that revenue could go,” said Eklund.
“I know I had a conversation with the Lieutenant Governor of Ohio, Jon Husted, some time ago who forwarded the idea that perhaps the pay to play fees at school districts could be covered by the sports gaming revenue stream. That’s one example of the kind of idea generation that the legislative process is creating so there is more to follow on that.”
Senator Eklund believes the biggest hurdle or opposition will come from the two bills and how they differ in the number of sportsbooks that could open. The House bill would allow many locations for sports betting while the Senate Bill would not. This may cause an issue as the bill progresses through the Legislature.
“The biggest hurdle will be, sort of the philosophical divide between expansive locations where this activity can be done with the House Bill whereas the Senate Bill restricts it to relatively few locations where it can be done. I strongly believe that this is not the kind of activity that we want going on in every gas station or convenience store in Ohio,” said Eklund.
Never having been one for mobile gambling platforms, Senator Eklund is now on board with that and legalizing sports betting which is why he created OH SB 111. He wants to make a safe environment for residents of the Buckeye State to wager on sporting events that they are already gambling on.
“If it can be done in a safe and secure way that has a lot of integrity to it, protects the public to the downside of gambling of any kind and can be done securely then I am in favor of it and I see no reason why we cannot meet those criteria, I really don’t. I was at one time opposed, inherently opposed to the idea of having sports gaming available online in Ohio but as I have studied it and heard from witnesses I have become convinced that the technology exists that would allow us to do that in a very very safe and actually maybe a safer and more controlled way than without online gaming and I have now become an advocate for it. I am extremely hopeful that we can get this done in 2020,” said Eklund.
Final Thoughts On Ohio Sports Betting Legalization
Both Representative Greenspan and Senator Eklund have a positive outlook on the legalization of sports betting in Ohio. Each agrees that the COVID-19 pandemic may stall the process as many other topics have to be discussed when the session reconvenes.
However, one thing is certain, legal sports betting is certainly on the lawmakers in the state’s radar and it is something that could very well occur in 2020 in terms of becoming a law.
In order to provide you with the best independent sports betting news and content LegalSportsBetting.com may receive a commission from partners when you make a purchase through a link on our site.
News tags: 5 House Bill 194 | Dave Greenspan | John Eklund | Jon Husted+96 | OH HB 194 | OH SB 111 | Ohio | Ohio Legislature | Senate Bill 111
Christina has been writing for as long as she can remember and does dedicated research on the newly regulated sports betting market. She comes from a family of sports lovers that engage in friendly bets from time to time. During the winter months, you can find Christina baking cookies and beating the entire staff at Mario Kart…the N64 version of course.